The lecture and the article are both discussing about possibility on decreasing days of working per week. While reading states that it could be profitable the professor refutes this point by saying that working four days a week won't effect economy, companies, and individuals in the way reading states.
First of all, reading posits that offering employees the option of 4 day work a week would benefit the economy as a whole. The professor opposes this point by saying that this policy will forces companies to hire new workers and this means they should spend much more money. He explains by adding that the extra money should pay for providing training, medical facilities, and adding to office space.
In addition, the article states that more rest and being alert according to less working time will decrease errors. The lecturer refutes this idea by saying that hiring new people is costly for companies and they should work over time to make up different.
Finally, the reading argues that this option would be beneficial for individuals. The professor made a counter argument by saying that it is a quite risky for employees, because it decreases their job stability. He explained more by saying that employees lose their chance to advance their professions and promotion in the company. Furthermore, companies may choose managers from five day per week employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'force'
Suggestion: force
...s point by saying that this policy will forces companies to hire new workers and this ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12389380531 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53046284843 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58407079646 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3582340538 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.272727273 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380434523572 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138645006364 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788143591883 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22113934126 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496519243756 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.