Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
-Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today, as there are more available sources of information for people, it is usual that teachers or meeting leaders make mistakes during their lecture or speech. Teachers and meeting leaders likely to have certain qualifications which distinguish them from others, but it does not mean that students and meeting members could not have personal opinion. Therefore, I recommend interruption and correcting mistakes in the class or meeting.
People should posit their opinion morally and others should respect them. Today, society have become more and more democratic, and freedom is one of fundamental principles of human right. Correcting teachers, or a skilled well-known person, or even parents, etc., does not mean like an unethical behavior. For instance, a students can ask permission and say that the opposite side of issue could be true, and it would be not bad to speak about opposite side too.
Asking questions may be informative for other students or meeting members. If we postpone asking question while we are certain in the teacher or meeting leader mistake, we will let other students or members to learn something wrong. It's unfair that people learn something that will cause some problems either. In some cases, teachers and leader will appreciate people who are so brave to challenge them.
In an interactive atmosphere, teachers and meeting leaders will prepare themselves more and more, so the class or meeting will be deeper and more valuable. People are do the things that are compelled to do them. For example teachers prepare themselves for class when they know there are some genius students which will ask them many question. As students ask more and more, teachers will present more materials, so the class will be more useful for students. This fact could be true for meetings too.
Correcting mistakes could be done by different approaches. Sometimes people interrupt classes or meetings just to make some fun with teachers and leaders. On the other hand some people correct their teacher or leader with feel of empathy to help them to be more successful in their presentation. The second approach is so valuable and essential.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ents and meeting members could not have personal opinion. Therefore, I recommend interruption an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...ke an unethical behavior. For instance, a students can ask permission and say that the opp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun question seems to be countable; consider using: 'many questions'.
Suggestion: many questions
...ome genius students which will ask them many question. As students ask more and more, teacher...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in some cases', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241645244216 0.229887763892 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.159383033419 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0925449871465 0.0866891130778 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0539845758355 0.046263068375 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0539845758355 0.0685040099705 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0925449871465 0.118717715034 78% => OK
Participles: 0.0334190231362 0.0351676179071 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60682359531 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0205655526992 0.0309702414327 66% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0488431876607 0.0887237588012 55% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0437017994859 0.0209618222197 208% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0154241645244 0.0139019557991 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2164.0 2387.08602151 91% => OK
No of words: 351.0 408.028673835 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16524216524 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48200974243 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390313390313 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.310541310541 0.251872472559 123% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207977207977 0.174417080927 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116809116809 0.112833075102 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60682359531 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504273504274 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 53.0473245925 59.2087087015 90% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.55 20.5533526081 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0657521031 48.84282405 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.2 120.699889404 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.55 20.5533526081 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.644075263715 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 48.6041310541 45.7405998639 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.375 1.45489161554 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367249224957 0.300154397459 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104028480997 0.103427244359 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0772966654542 0.0752933317313 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.475767326003 0.497263757937 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157346609247 0.151897553556 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130534197212 0.114077575197 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976540470994 0.0781384742642 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.250552094013 0.336927656856 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.075125359144 0.067059652881 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244904679434 0.210909579961 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501698416613 0.0618886996521 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.