It's not uncommon that in the classroom teachers would make some mistakes since everyone can't be flawless. Generally, in this condition what we choose to perform will lead to utterly different consequences. Among saying nothing or interrupting teachers right away, or waiting until class or meetings and then talking with them, I perfect correcting teachers after classes or meetings. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas by subsequent paragraphs.
First, interrupting and correcting the mistake immediately could harm teachers' feeling, in turn having negative impact on students' learning on the rest time of the class. Teachers who engaged a colossal amount of time in preparing the class, are supposed to be respected. Hence, it would be unnecessary and impolite to interrupt our teachers for their unaware mistakes suddenly. However, instead of pointing out teachers' or meeting leaders' errors right away, talking these mistakes with them after class or meetings not only can show our respect for them, but also can avoid teachers' awkwardness. On the other hand, there are also some inconvenient caused to the rest students by interrupting teachers' mistake immediately. Once teachers' feeling is swayed, probably they would have less passion for following teaching and the quality of this lesson will be considerably discounted. Undoubtedly, the rest students will fall victim to these results which can be completely avoided.
Second, saying nothing to some extent encourages teachers to keep making mistakes on the next time. As is common sense, we have to correct our behavior immediately when we find our mistakes. As an old adage saying, never let the mistakes happen the third time. If we escape the responsibility to correct our teachers' mistakes, chances are that we would gain some incorrect information which leads to some bad consequences in either our testing scores or future careers. Thus, for our own benefits' sake, correcting teachers' mistakes is essential.
Third, talking about mistakes with your teachers later enable us to foster a close relationship with our teachers. People no doubt will be appreciated to such person who correct their mistake in an appropriate way. Consequently, they will show more kindness and meanwhile pay more attention to your academic performance. In this way, it's easier for you to fulfill your goals. On the other hand, more chances to communicate with teachers who have rich life experience expand your outlook, also encourage you when you are crippled by adversities or setbacks.
To sum up, as factors mentioned above illustrates, the best way to solve the problem perfectly that teachers make mistakes in the classroom or meetings is to talk with your teachers later.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...would make some mistakes since everyone cant be flawless. Generally, in this conditi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...o such person who correct their mistake in an appropriate way. Consequently, they will show more kind...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, while, i feel, no doubt, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2546728972 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76900901213 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9874443878 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.227272727 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310256065277 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084041409897 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849953476141 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176835590585 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656884734071 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.