Leadership is charming and in the significant moment it can make a big difference. Not only a country needs it, a small family including four-five members also requires leadership. In modern societies, a raging debate over whether leadership is talent, meaning that you can't learn to be a leader has aroused recently. In my view, however, leadership can certainly be gained through learning.
Granted, talent no doubt plays a crucial role in leadership, but it doesn't imply that you don't need any learning. Even though you probably have gift in leadership, keeping constant learning can make the leadership perfectible. Likening the leadership to a sophisticated machine, talent is only a small part of the machine. If you really want the machine works well, other parts are supposed to run together.
First of all, leadership don't only include talent, there are other essential parts inside the leadership. Let's face the fact: the ability of public speech, the interpersonal skills, communications, the vision, and the tenacity contribute jointly to leadership. It's probably true that you might have talent in one or two factors, even three, and it's virtually impossible for you to be talented of all these factors. Therefore, no one is a born leader. Instead of being intimidated by so called talent, people definitely can become a preeminent leader by dedicating a colossal amount of time to fill the gap between the normal and the genius. Putting heavily emphasis on talent generally frightens people off and is partly responsible for the rarity of leaders.
Second, in terms of leadership, efforts enjoy the same importance with genius. Downplaying efforts and appreciating genius are the common means adopted by us, and that helps to escape the possible adversities of which we might be crippled. The immense energy of being industrious constantly lead to amazing consequences beyond our expectation. Even through you have talent of leadership, without breaking a sweat, chances are that your ability will decline since other people are in the advancement. If you don't want to be replaced and desire to be a high ranking leader, bearing in mind that it's always helpful to pour your heart and soul into improving yourselves.
In short, I deeply believe that everyone has a potential to be a leader if they choose to be one, and are willing to pay efforts and never give up.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... leadership is talent, meaning that you cant learn to be a leader has aroused recent...
^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ys a crucial role in leadership, but it doesnt imply that you dont need any learning. ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eadership, but it doesnt imply that you dont need any learning. Even though you prob...
^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n together. First of all, leadership dont only include talent, there are other es...
^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... essential parts inside the leadership. Lets face the fact: the ability of public sp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 508, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r people are in the advancement. If you dont want to be replaced and desire to be a ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, therefore, well, in short, no doubt, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12020460358 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85670078913 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585677749361 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7847522157 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.55 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211013182843 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067296821836 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401982659058 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127008829319 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162699571381 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.