Nowadays, an increasing people are concerned about the way we should choose to point out the mistake of our leaders or our teachers. However, whether it is better to interrupt and correct the mistake right away or wait until the end of the class or even say nothing about this wrong place is a controversial issue. My view is that we should be brave to interrupt and correct the mistake right away, rather than saying nothing or waiting until the class or the meeting is over.
First, it is obvious that regardless of the classes or the meetings, their paces are always fast and could jump to another issue or key point at some seconds. This is because all the issues or knowledge needed to be discussed in the class and the meeting are usually important and numerous, making the time of the meeting or the class that could spend on each issue become very limited and little, not to say about the pace of the meeting and the class. Therefore, in this respect, when you countered something incorrect of the speaker, it is a better choice for you to point it out directly, for the sake of not just letting the mistake running and being ignore simply----once it was skipped, then there might be few chances to compensate it, even you may want to try to figure it out after the class or the meeting, since there were so many issue that had been discuss before. So, it is a better way to interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
Moreover, when you are discussing about something in a hurry or something relevant to the incoming future, even one small mistake left or overlooked by the discussion could reverse the overall future of yours, and may even turn it into a disorder, making the justification of the wrong places very significant. For example, in the preparation for a war or a big battle, in order to get the victory of the war, there would be many details needed to be discuss and justified. And any details in this discussion would determine the direction of the war. So, in the discussion about preparation of the war, it is so necessary for the commanders to correct every wrong places at a moment. Once they are left or skipped, they would cause big lost of the war.
This is not to say that we could not take other's feeling into consideration when we point out the mistake. Of cause, sometimes, the manners you choose when you speak about the false could affect and even determine how others would sue your opinion. But this does not mean that we should think too much about this, it may be good for us to consider about this.
In sum, we should choose to correct the mistake right away no matter we are in a class or a meeting. Meanwhile, we should not ignore that we could choose a reasonable way or manner to express our opinion and correct the mistake. By doing this, we could make sure that we would not suffer any problem or disadvantages brought by the wrongness we skipped or left in the meeting or the class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 839, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun issue seems to be countable; consider using: 'many issues'.
Suggestion: many issues
...ass or the meeting, since there were so many issue that had been discuss before. So, it is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 864, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'discussed'.
Suggestion: discussed
... there were so many issue that had been discuss before. So, it is a better way to inter...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: OF_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of course' (=naturally)?
Suggestion: Of course
...deration when we point out the mistake. Of cause, sometimes, the manners you choose when...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 34.0 13.8261648746 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 535.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51214953271 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43398938084 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426168224299 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.0667962003 48.9658058833 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.111111111 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7222222222 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246246391661 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893833384986 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903352872526 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147764238534 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960477277492 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.1575268817 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.