According to the reading, working for 4 days a week would benefit some employees, benefit the company as well. working a shortened work week may help increase the company profit that would benefit employee feel more rested and alert that can result for few mistakes or errors in their work. It can also reduced unemployment rates. For example, if a full time employee work for 4 days a week they will have more time to spend with their family, able to finish private tasks also, they for leisure activities. On the contrary, according to the lecturer, he refutes what's the reading was all about. The lecturer states that working 4 days a week will cause more problems it will increase the company health benefits. The lecturer refutes that employees will work overtime that would end up with cutting more jobs. In conclusion, working for 4 days has advantages and disadvantages .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Working
...employees, benefit the company as well. working a shortened work week may help increase...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...es or errors in their work. It can also reduced unemployment rates. For example, if a f...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...d unemployment rates. For example, if a full time employee work for 4 days a week they wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 564, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
..., according to the lecturer, he refutes whats the reading was all about. The lecturer...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 878, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 4 days has advantages and disadvantages .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 30.3222958057 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 1373.03311258 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 150.0 270.72406181 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 4.04702891845 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50234747907 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 145.348785872 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 419.366225166 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6727489867 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.125 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473154805081 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200768052813 0.0996497079465 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132759345372 0.0662205650399 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.473154805081 0.162205337803 292% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 63.6247240618 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.