The author and the lecture hold a set of conflicting opinions about offering 4 days working per week. According to the passage, it is the author's opinion that it has several merits, and provides three reasons to support it. However, the lecture states that it's dubious and skeptical, thus opposing each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading material suggest that offering 4 days instead of 5 days will reduce the working cost and increase the rest of the worker so he will reduce the possibility of errors. In contrast, the professor puts forth the idea that this is false, because the company have to spend more money to hire new workers and to train them, plus that the company have to purchase new computers and make space for new of new offices. Clearly a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. Hence, first the proposal is negated.
Second, the article pushes forth the idea that it will reduces unemployment rate. However, the classroom discussion contends that by states that some of the companies offering overtime and they will rise expectation of the 4 days worker to do the same job of the 5 days worker, thus no addition jobs. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in reading is unsubstantiated.
As the last point to emphasize the reading claim, the author says that the free time that the employee gets, will help him to increase the quality of his life. Conversely, the professor refutes this point by explaining that the worker will decrees the ability of the job ability and will reduce the chance of getting advancing in his carrier. Therefore, climate fluctuations cannot explain this decline.
In summary, while both the reading and classroom discussion provide interesting information with regards to the working days, a significant amount of evidence support that working 5 days is better than 4 days. Therefore, the reading passage fails to justify the claims.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ek. According to the passage, it is the authors opinion that it has several merits, and...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...icle pushes forth the idea that it will reduces unemployment rate. However, the classro...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...discussion contends that by states that some of the companies offering overtime and they wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'decree'
Suggestion: decree
...oint by explaining that the worker will decrees the ability of the job ability and will...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98176291793 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61311217599 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528875379939 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3075737088 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.266666667 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181351722205 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476285720393 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498144907037 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891873127311 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344107157531 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.