In the lecture, the professor makes several points about the four day week employment. The professor argues that the company requires to spend more money for the training and health benefits of their employers. This is different from the reading which states that this kind of working environment shall benefit the economy,employers as well as the company. However, the professor casts doubt on the reading with several points.
Firstly, the company will have to allocate more money for more employers. Likewise, their medical allowances should also be met. On the contrary the reading states that profit of company increases when the employers are given rest which makes them alert and less error prone on a four day work schedule. The lecture casts doubt on this by conveying that there will be more spending involved on office space and computers for the workers.
Secondly, the lecture says that the unemployment issue will not be sorted. This is due to the fact that hiring will increase the expenses and eventually the employers will have to work more and overtime to meet their expectations. Nevertheless, the reading states that there will be a hike in employment rate during the four day work environment. This point is contradicted by the statement that no additional jobs will be created.
Finally, the professor argues that the quality of life of workers will be challenged. It is claimed that there is no job stability and career advancement in a four day week employment. However, in the reading it states that more leisure time and enjoyment would definitely improve their life. These points casts doubt on the passage which confers that five days a week is more better than four days a week job culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
...fessor argues that the company requires to spend more money for the training and healt...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the company requires to spend more money for the training and health benefits of...
^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o spend more money for the training and health benefits of their employers. This...
^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , employers
...ng environment shall benefit the economy,employers as well as the company. However, the pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at no additional jobs will be created. Finally, the professor argues that the ...
^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ional jobs will be created. Finally, the professor argues that the quality of...
^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... which confers that five days a week is more better than four days a week job culture.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, kind of, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64832659806 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491289198606 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1058907145 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.125 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307081377935 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102938482365 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482950132002 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195999211445 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358771516337 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.