The reading and the lecture are both about four days employees. The author of the reading believes that it would be advantageous not only for workers but also for companies. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that it will not be beneficial.
First of all, the author points out that giving four days for employers can enhance the company’s budget. It is mentioned that workers would receive 80 percent of previous payment and, hence, the economy would be improved. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that paying less for four-day employs will not help but will harm the income because more employers mean more medical help should be provided. Furthermore, he argues that the company would need to spend more money for more computers and offices.
Secondly, the author contends that less unemployment would be in the country with four days work because more additional workers would be needed. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that the company would instead push workers to work the same amount of tasks as it was previously.
Finally, the author states that employees would have more time to spend it with their friends and family. The article establishes that it would improve their lives and make it happier. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that it would reduce their quality of life because they have the risk to lose their job during the economic crisis. She puts forth the idea that the company would instead save five days workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nly for workers but also for companies. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e amount of tasks as it was previously. Finally, the author states that employee...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90661478599 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36585474923 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544747081712 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7292989598 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8125 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0625 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479203094101 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140976120756 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889566874995 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279796677416 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059033311427 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.