Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is an important part of our lives because it helps us to learn a lot of new things and prepares for the future career. Some prefer classes with no discussions but with lectures. Others think the opposite. In my opinion, I postulate that both of sides have pros and cons. However, from point of view, it is more advantageous to have conversations with no lecture. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I would explore in the following essay.
To begin with, we need to take into the consideration that discussions would help students to stay focused because it is interesting when you can chat with your fellows and the professor. In contrast, lectures with no discussions are tedious and, as a result, students may lose their attention. An apt illustration to support my idea is my personal experience. Two years ago I was taking English courses in America for two weeks. Basically, we were having a lot of discussions on different themes. I remember that one day we were talking about mass media. For me, it was the boring and sophisticated lesson. However, every person was allowed to express his or her opinion and that helped me not only to understand the complex material but also stay concentrated. I have heard a lot of interesting opinions that made me involved in the discussion and, as a result, I was able to entertain and at the same time get the challenging material. Without having discussions with my teacher and classmates I would not have stayed concentrated on that lesson. For this reason, I think discussions are essential because it makes lectures unconventional, which helps you to stay concentrated.
Secondly, discussions help a person to overcome a public fear. It is not a secret that in the future career you would need to perform in front of other people. Therefore, this skill is worthwhile and discussions help you to train this skill. And again the example that I have mentioned above is a compelling example of that. As a kid I was timid and that is why I was afraid to speak in public. However, during English course, I was forced to speak in order to have a better mark. In the beginning, it was hard to express my ideas because it was not a common practice for me. Nevertheless, continuous discussions helped me to eliminate my fear and it became much easier to talk with other mates. In the current moment, I feel myself more confidently to participate in debates or presentations and it was done with the help of discussions. On the other hand, I believe I would not have improved this skill by just listening to the professor. Hence, discussions help you to get rid of the public fear and, consequently, succeed in the future.
To sum up, I firmly believe that lessons which are centered on discussions are more valuable than those in which professor does all of the talking. This is because such classes help students to not be distracted during the lecture and, apart from that, it gives students opportunity to develop their speaking abilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...able than those in which professor does all of the talking. This is because such classes h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, as for, i feel, i think, in contrast, talking about, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2484.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 523.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74952198853 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86471824681 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48948374761 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6084867449 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4333333333 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239130507042 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637622115628 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095452753659 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158265739099 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450048326529 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.