Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is generally reckoned that the vast majority of people hold the view that under no circumstances can we ignore the significance of the education of youngster; teaching methods, which ensure the efficiency of learning, is of great influence to education. As the old Chinese saying goes, ' a person who only listen cannot understand,' I believe that studying is far more than just listen. Discussions can bring more benefits to students. I will delve in the reasons of taking this stance in the following paragraph.
First and foremost, studying through discussion allows students to exchange their ideas on the issue. Thus, they are able to understand different perspectives of others and thus acquire a full picture of the topic. For instance, in Hong Kong, we have Liberal Studies classes in which teacher encourages us to express our viewpoint on various social phenomena. These topics often require us to put our shoes in different stakeholder. It is impossible for individuals to think from all stakeholders' perspective, while through group discussions, we develop a better understanding toward the issue because we are able to consider a wider range of viewpoint.
Furthermore, communication skills are able to train by a discussion-based lessons. It is a truth universally acknowledged that communication skills, including conveying the viewpoint precisely, grasp others ideas quickly and accurately, is of great importance to people's life, contributing to the workplace harmony and the working efficiency. A discussion-based lecture help adolescents to develop their interacting strategies. During conversations, students have to express their stance to others, and their interacting abilities are trained. As a case in point, I have never face problem of communication after I graduate. Thanks to the discussions I had in my high school, I am well-trained for conversation that I can understand others' points and give response quickly.
I was always amazed when I hear people saying that there should be almost no discussion in the class. Admittedly, professors are of more intelligence than students do, and they can thus give students a clear picture and avoid them making conceptual mistakes. However, leaving no room for discussion stifle creativity of people. They can only repeat what the teacher has taught, without creating their own understanding on the issue. To avoid them having wrong concept, the professor should provide guidance to the direction of conversation.
In short, I believe that the lecture should be discussion-based because it allows teenagers to acquire a full picture of the topic and develops their communication capability. The teacher should leave a suitable room of discussion, not more, not less.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucation. As the old Chinese saying goes, a person who only listen cannot understa...
^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stakeholders'' or 'stakeholder's'?
Suggestion: stakeholders'; stakeholder's
...sible for individuals to think from all stakeholders perspective, while through group discus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'faced'.
Suggestion: faced
...ained. As a case in point, I have never face problem of communication after I gradua...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43325526932 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22784600748 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559718969555 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6001463497 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4090909091 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1468591025 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401351097281 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418284759573 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763205825241 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513839640161 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.