TPO 01 task 1
The reading and the lecture are both about four-day week employment including its positive and negative sides. The author of the reading feels that there are three possible advantages of this specific type of working time. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that this four-day work schedule deteriorates the economy and quality of the company.
To begin with, the author argues that shortened work time enhances profits of the organization. The article mentions that the whole idea is cost effective in terms of 80 percent money and more hardworking employees. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims hiring extra staff is costly as the company has to spend more money for training. Moreover, he says that there are also additional costs associated with health benefits, more office space and computers.
Secondly, the writer suggests that this policy will reduce unemployment rate. In the article, it is said that the shifted workload would give more job opportunity. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that other job opportunities are available. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that four-day week workers can overtime to compensate the five-day works.
Finally, the author posts that the proposed plan worktime would provide more free time for the individual employees with the lower income. Additionally, in the article it is stated that the extra time could improve the state of their life by giving more time to their family or passing time with their hobbies. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that more free time would introduce more risks. He notes that the workers could face problem in advancing their career due to reduced workload. Furthermore, they could lose jobs as well as promotion since the promotion is offered to the full time employees in a managerial position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of this specific type of working time. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 7, column 594, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...n since the promotion is offered to the full time employees in a managerial position.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as to, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20588235294 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68203512304 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.319223066 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349608600396 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090142671864 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586054683273 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17838557767 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600696823122 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.