The reading and the lecture are both about working in a group. The author of the reading believes that it brings three advantages. However, the lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He provides a situation of a company as an example for his thinking that none of those ideas, which the author of the reading mentions are unconvincing.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that working in a group will provide wider range of knowledge and they will work faster. They come up with greater solutions for solving problems. This point is challenged by the lecture. He says that when people working together they usually spend a lot of time on meeting and gather members together. Therefore, it takes longer time to finish their jobs than working alone.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that working in a group will encourage members to make risky decision, because if the decision is wrong, the whole group will take responsibility. The lecture rebuts this argument that when people working in a group if some people have new ideas or decisions, the group usually make them drop and if they follow their ideas, and the result is not good the members of that new idea will be blamed.
Finally, the author of the reading states that if members of a group contribute a good contribution they will receive rewards according to their contributions, and they will be recognized as highly significant. The lecture on the other hand, opposes this point that when people working in a group, if they do a good job, the reward will separate into the whole group and the members who have done a good job have no recognition. Therefore, they usually feel uncomfortable.
In conclusion, the author of the reading tends to believe that working in a team brings many benefits. However, the lecture refutes all of those ideas that the author of the reading has mentioned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he author of the reading has mentioned.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82012195122 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55603290448 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475609756098 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7278658086 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8125 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336331036362 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108275291039 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813652979609 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189092229397 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972555306699 0.0443174109184 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.