The reading and lecture discuss the use of vessels, which was discovered in Iraq. The author of the reading believes that it was not used as batteries. However, the speaker casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He says that none of those ideas are unconvincing.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that if vessels were utilized as batteries, they would likely have been attached with some other electricity, such as metal wires. This point is challenged by the speaker. He restates the fact that the vessels was excavated by local people, not by experts. There might have conductor nearby the vessels, but the local people might not concern about wires or they could overlook and throw them away.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that the vessels could use to hold sacred texts because people also used other copper cylinders, which look like this vessels to use in the same purpose. Ancient people did not use the vessels for making electric. The speaker rebuts this idea by arguing that the reason that the author of the reading has mentioned does not make sense. Ancient people could use the vessels for different purposes. Moreover, the first batteries was born by iron rock with liquid like the vessels contained.
Finally, the author of the reading states that ancient people did not have any device that based on electricity. The speaker, on the other hand, opposes this point by suggesting that modern people use batteries to heal the pain of patients. Therefore, ancient people could also use for the same task.
In conclusion, the speaker refutes all the ideas that the author of the reading has mentioned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...other copper cylinders, which look like this vessels to use in the same purpose. Anc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89007092199 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31019863987 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503546099291 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8914199748 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1176470588 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306974420079 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101434422432 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897487707943 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155062862489 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104644069123 0.0443174109184 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.