TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people

The reading and lecture both about discussing the organizations, how it woks and the contribution of their members. the reading describes that it is beneficial to work as a team and the end result would be very obvious. While the lecturer claims that the consequences of engaging in a group sometime gives very pathetic result. First, the author of reading explains that submitting experiences of every single person makes a huge complement to the group. in simple words, 2 is more than 1. On the other hand, the professor cast doubts this, he thinks, it is not compulsory that each member is giving his contribution equally.

Furthermore, the reading passage suggests that working in a group, as one of each member gives his best and as a result, the team succeeded with flying colors, but it challenges by the lecturer that it is not usually the results, many of the times, due to different people involves, their behavior, their mentality and their level of understanding, all these facts leads to very the unexpected result.

In last, the author of the reading tells us that co-worker always gets prize possession by encouragement his work and appreciates for his effort. In contrast, the professor opposes that, there is always a confusion between the groups, because many of the members does not shows their full part or piece of working so this is very unethical to the other members of the group and does not seems justify to every single member.

In conclusion, both the author and the lecturer disagree to each other opinion and make a differences according to their level of thoughts.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... and the contribution of their members. the reading describes that it is beneficial...
^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d the end result would be very obvious. While the lecturer claims that the consequenc...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 456, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...n makes a huge complement to the group. in simple words, 2 is more than 1. On the ...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'show'
Suggestion: show
...s, because many of the members does not shows their full part or piece of working so ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seem'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: seem
...other members of the group and does not seems justify to every single member. I...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...other members of the group and does not seems justify to every single member. I...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t seems justify to every single member. In conclusion, both the author and the l...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s justify to every single member. In conclusion, both the author and the lec...
^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a difference' or simply 'differences'?
Suggestion: a difference; differences
...disagree to each other opinion and make a differences according to their level of thoughts.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92250922509 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74297596745 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542435424354 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.1877512599 49.2860985944 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.4 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227256947058 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870892370282 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423075722231 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125784182661 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672505754312 0.0443174109184 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.