The reading and the lecture are both about the team work which has good impact on task. the author of reading believes that a team can work more readily as compared to individual because a group consist of people which has wide range of knowledge, expertise, and skill. the lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. he says the group is responsible for projection to make a company successful.
first of all, the author mention out that if a group leader take a decision and their decision not work well no body in the group would be responsible for that.this point is challenges by a speaker. he says that for every decision which a team is taking each of them is responsible because some decision takes conses quickly and some not. furthermore he argues that some creative idea that a group made might not work well thus, when the projection failed everyone in the group are blame.
secondly, the author contends that the group can take very risky decision and also they can work together very quickly. the lecturer on the other hand posit that the group did not contribute to each other and the leader is responsible to do as a head.
in conclusion the lecture reading both are about working as team or group. the professor effectively challenges the claim made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...eam work which has good impact on task. the author of reading believes that a team ...
^^^
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nge of knowledge, expertise, and skill. the lecture casts doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...oubt on the claims made in the article. he says the group is responsible for proje...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ojection to make a company successful. first of all, the author mention out that if ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...cision and their decision not work well no body in the group would be responsible for t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
....this point is challenges by a speaker. he says that for every decision which a te...
^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...sion takes conses quickly and some not. furthermore he argues that some creative idea that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: furthermore,
...sion takes conses quickly and some not. furthermore he argues that some creative idea that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ckly and some not. furthermore he argues that some creative idea that a group mad...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ailed everyone in the group are blame. secondly, the author contends that the group can...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...so they can work together very quickly. the lecturer on the other hand posit that t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...eader is responsible to do as a head. in conclusion the lecture reading both are...
^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...oth are about working as team or group. the professor effectively challenges the cl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67248908297 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45742527824 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493449781659 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4839904629 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2727272727 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413635718473 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151323283896 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880782409002 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240219705695 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691518203101 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 63.6247240618 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.