TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people

The Lecture talked about an experiment that was made by a company for 6 months where it decided to turn over a project to a team of people. The team was responsible for planning the project and getting the work done. The results were not successful for the following reasons.

First of all, There was no justice among the team members, for example some members did not contribute as much, and yet when the project is successful they do not get less benefits than the real contributors. This refutes the reading passage where it was mentioned that a group of people has a wider range of knowledge,expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess.

Secondly, accomplishing the project by a team might be more slowly than a single individual because they may require many meetings to reach an agreement on how to move on with the project. That is the opposite of what was mentioned in the reading passage that because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it.

Thirdly, one or two members may have the most influence on the whole team which may affect the team in two negative ways. They either can convince the team that a specific idea will never work which will drop the whole descusion about this idea. Or they can convince the team that a specific idea is highly creative and when the project fails all the members are blamed even though other members may have worn them but they were ignored. This directly refutes the reading passage where it was mentioned that a team of people can come up with highly creative solutions cause a group is more likely to take risky decisions than single individuals

Votes
Average: 7.4 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the project and getting the work done. The results were not successful for the fol...
^^^
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun benefits is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e project is successful they do not get less benefits than the real contributors. Th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding passage where it was mentioned that a group of people has a wider range of k...
^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dly, accomplishing the project by a team might be more slowly than a single indi...
^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... project by a team might be more slowly than a single individual because they ma...
^^
Line 6, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work which will drop the whole descusion about this idea. Or they can convince th...
^^
Line 6, column 628, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more likely to take risky decisions than single individuals
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'for example', 'first of all', 'on the whole']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.211180124224 0.261695866417 81% => OK
Verbs: 0.170807453416 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0683229813665 0.0723426182421 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0590062111801 0.0435111971325 136% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0341614906832 0.0277247811725 123% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114906832298 0.128828473217 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0372670807453 0.0370669169778 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57405240181 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0248447204969 0.0208969081088 119% => OK
Particles: 0.00621118012422 0.00154638098197 402% => OK
Determiners: 0.145962732919 0.128158765124 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0341614906832 0.0158828679856 215% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0310559006211 0.0114777025283 271% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1740.0 1645.83664459 106% => OK
No of words: 305.0 271.125827815 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70491803279 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.304918032787 0.374372842146 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.245901639344 0.287516216867 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.144262295082 0.187439937562 77% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.072131147541 0.113142543107 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57405240181 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504918032787 0.539623497131 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.6903677706 53.8517498576 94% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 27.7272727273 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4403196902 49.3711431718 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.181818182 132.220823453 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 0.878197800319 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.39072847682 206% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 52.3174366617 50.5018328374 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.37647058824 1.90840788429 72% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.682154036911 0.549887131256 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.166782383625 0.142949733639 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0477948935185 0.0787303798458 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.65435418027 0.631733273073 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0872426407918 0.139662658121 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.324733267649 0.266732575781 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108578990116 0.103435571967 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.418633036197 0.414875509568 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0309065146496 0.0530846634433 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.503700970387 0.40443939384 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850677196131 0.0528353158467 161% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

even though other members may have worn them but they were ignored.
Description: don't put 'even though' 'but' in one sentence.

can come up with highly creative solutions cause a group is more likely to take risky decisions than single individuals
can come up with highly creative solutions because a group is more likely to take risky decisions than single individuals

Sentence: They either can convince the team that a specific idea will never work which will drop the whole descusion about this idea.
Error: descusion Suggestion: discussion

flaws:
No. of Words: 306 250 //some duplicated content in the last paragraph

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 306 250
No. of Characters: 1400 1200
No. of Different Words: 153 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.182 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.575 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.355 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.818 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.552 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.364 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.405 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.633 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.106 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4