TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task
In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge，expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to “shine”, to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team’s overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
In the reading, the auther claims that contributing in a group as a team for certain projects have several advantages by pointing out three reasons of support, However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer repudiates the claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that every individuals have special skill and knowlege which they can share them with each other so they have a broad knowledge of the problems and can see the problem in many sides. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the result is recognition by all members of group and if the project fails , the individual who work well can't separate from the group. According to him, the failure is recognized by the whole group not with the name of people.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that working in a group cause better and faster results and causes more creative results since the duties spread to all the members. Beside, in the group, people are tend to experience risky decisions due to the fact that the results are untertaking the group, not person. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that the time that a project running in a group is much more than individual. The lecturer explains that the group must hold several meetings for reaching the time when the project is started. Consequently, the time for reaching the best results is too long.
Finally, the author asserts tye members of a group have better opportunity to shine and get their notions as the last point for supporting the fact that working in a group project is much more effective. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by pointing out that this statement does not work when an individual idea drop down. As he states if the project with one's idea doesn't go froward well and fail, all the members blame that person fr the idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...embers of group and if the project fails , the individual who work well cant separ...
^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ct fails , the individual who work well cant separate from the group. According to h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the group, people are tend to experience risky decisions due to the fact that the...
^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... down. As he states if the project with ones idea doesnt go froward well and fail, a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he states if the project with ones idea doesnt go froward well and fail, all the membe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, well, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81039755352 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48653235927 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532110091743 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3551986162 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.083333333 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389637107744 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133423188135 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521932148841 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221865910855 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044641947249 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.7273730684 182% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.