The article states that the painting known as 'Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet' was not really painted by Rembrandt and gives three reasons to prove it. The professor's opinion is that the painting was really drawn by Rembrandt and gives several reasons for it.
First, the article states that there was something inconsistent about the way woman was dressed. Professor refutes this opinion by stating that after various x-ray studies of the fur, it was determined that the fur was not the part of original painting. The fur was added to the painting after about a hundred years because someone wanted to increase its price. Thus, professor states that the elderly lady was in fact a servant and a fur collar was painted over the original painting.
Second, the passage posits that even though Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, in the painting the elements didn't fit together. However, professor says that this was because of the addition of the fur collar. Once the fur collar was removed, a light colored cloth became visible behind it. This cloth reflected light on the face of the elderly lady. As a result, the painting looked more realistic once the light cloth was revealed.
Third, the passage puts forth that the paintings back seemed as if many wooden pieces were stuck together even though Rembrandt always used a single piece of wood. Professor refutes this opinion by stating that the extra wooden pieces were added when the fur color was added. The wood panel was enlarged by adding extra wood pieces to make it look majestic. The original painting had only one piece. Furthermore, the single piece of wood matched with Rembrandt's another painting of his own portrait with a hat. Hence, professor explains that the wood used in painting was original and extra pieces were later added to the original work of Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...nd gives three reasons to prove it. The professors opinion is that the painting was really...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nd shadow, in the painting the elements didnt fit together. However, professor says t...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thus', 'in fact', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268786127168 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.182080924855 0.158904122519 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0809248554913 0.0723426182421 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0404624277457 0.0435111971325 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0202312138728 0.0277247811725 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147398843931 0.128828473217 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0635838150289 0.0370669169778 172% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.28341949462 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.014450867052 0.0208969081088 69% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.135838150289 0.128158765124 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0028901734104 0.0114777025283 25% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1869.0 1645.83664459 114% => OK
No of words: 318.0 271.125827815 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87735849057 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.364779874214 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261006289308 0.287516216867 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.154088050314 0.187439937562 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0754716981132 0.113142543107 67% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28341949462 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471698113208 0.539623497131 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.0070703963 53.8517498576 87% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7058823529 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2221815924 49.3711431718 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.941176471 132.220823453 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.878197800319 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 44.8065112838 50.5018328374 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.97619047619 1.90840788429 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.662516383246 0.549887131256 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149990312065 0.142949733639 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0730603747784 0.0787303798458 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.626518578157 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124360090411 0.139662658121 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.311309384914 0.266732575781 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955384079393 0.103435571967 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.489960548413 0.414875509568 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0623117613128 0.0530846634433 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.502930857504 0.40443939384 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334820815623 0.0528353158467 63% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.26048565121 235% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 3.1766004415 315% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.2958057395 165% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.