Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Everyone has different views and perspectives in every field. However, certain people have better judgement of the situation which they develop after gaining experience and knowledge of that field. I partially agree with the statement that critical judgement of work less value unless its coming from an expert. Although the critical judgement of an expert is valuable, the judgements of amateurs are valuable too.
Certainly, experts will have more experience than amateurs or people new to a field. Experts are experts because not only they have proper understanding of the knowledge regarding their field, but, also know how to apply the knowledge. Experts have performed similar tasks over and over again to improve their judgements regarding their field. For example, consider a soccer player. A soccer player practices kicking and aiming the ball everyday. Only after continuously honing his skill he has precise control over the ball and thus becomes an expert. Similarly, in the field of medicine, physicians after gaining years of experience are able to diagnose the disease or problems with the patient more easily than an amateur doctor. Certain doctors are experts and highly recommended because of their expertise, which is obtained by not just their knowledge but by their experience too. Thus experience plays most important role in critical judgements.
However, it is not always necessary that an amateurs opinion might not be valuable. In an amateur or a person new to certain field, will have enough knowledge to understand things in his field and form opinions based on it. For example, consider a newly hired engineer hired for a job in steam power plant. Although he will be new and just have completed his training, he will have necessary knowledge regarding the work he is doing. So if the boiler pressure starts increasing, the amateur because of his knowledge will know what to do in the situation. As a result, even the critical judgement of an amateur should be valued as long as he has necessary knowledge.
Finally, the education system or the training of any student or new hire plays an important role in his actions regarding any situation in his field. If a student has gained lots of practical knowledge and has performed several experiments, his judgements will have high value. A good training for a person in hospitality industry will ensure happier guests in his watch. Although, the training or educational practicals wont be same as the real work, they have a huge impact on our judgements and actions when similar situations are emulated during work.
In conclusion, even though critical judgements of experts carry more weight, those of amateurs shouldn't be neglected. A professionals experience, education and training in his field of work plays an important role in his critical judgements during work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...r practices kicking and aiming the ball everyday. Only after continuously honing his ski...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'amateurs'' or 'amateur's'?
Suggestion: amateurs'; amateur's
...ver, it is not always necessary that an amateurs opinion might not be valuable. In an am...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ts carry more weight, those of amateurs shouldnt be neglected. A professionals experienc...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'however', 'if', 'regarding', 'similarly', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26326129666 0.240241500013 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.139489194499 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0864440078585 0.0880659088768 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0628683693517 0.0497285424764 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.056974459725 0.0444667217837 128% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.127701375246 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0471512770138 0.0406280797675 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74405268776 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0137524557957 0.030933414821 44% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.090373280943 0.0997080785238 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0176817288802 0.0249443105267 71% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0098231827112 0.0148568991511 66% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2851.0 2732.02544248 104% => OK
No of words: 462.0 452.878318584 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.170995671 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.41341991342 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.322510822511 0.280924506359 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.231601731602 0.200843997647 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.158008658009 0.132149295362 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74405268776 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 219.290929204 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458874458874 0.48968727796 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.3329871655 55.4138127331 93% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.48 23.380412469 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8098087121 59.4972553346 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.04 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.48 23.380412469 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.48 0.674092028746 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 50.7310822511 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.68939393939 1.64882698954 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413081402935 0.391690518653 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.101564854841 0.123202303941 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0814848667512 0.077325440228 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.446817620653 0.547984918172 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159013128238 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139007781744 0.161403998019 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075221069272 0.0892212321368 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.360331871941 0.385218514788 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0184337678758 0.0692045440612 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280037884695 0.275328986314 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601696263287 0.0653680567796 92% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.