The author describes that there are problems with the painting that suggest it could be a work by Rembrandt. On the other hand, the lecturer states that even though the reasons are partly true, but after examination researchers concluded the work is done by Rembrandt and refute each of the author’s reasons.
First of all, the writer states that there is an inconsistency about the woman's dressing style in the portrait. Nevertheless, the professor points out that the fur collar was not in the original painting and it was added to the top of the original painting after it was made. To be more specific, it was added in order to increase the value of the painting and make it more formal by portraying an aristocratic lady.
Second, according to the reading, although Rembrandt was highly skillful in painting light and shadow, in this painting these items were not in harmony. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that fur collar should remove from the original painting. Indeed, light and color were part of the woman's face, and her face should not be in partial shadow as expected. In this way, the painting is more realistic.
Third, the author expresses that this painting was painted on a panel glued together, yet none of his painting known to be as Rembrandt work and done on this kind of panel. However, the speaker posits that the original painting was on a single wood as it expected, but after the fur collar was painted over the original painting, extra pieces of wood were added to make the painting more grand. Moreover, he portrayed on the wood of the same tree which he always utilized in another his paintings, such as his "self-portrait with a hat" painting.
Therefore, the points mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83552631579 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6796836828 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490131578947 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.238581111 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500034671317 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179194396502 0.0996497079465 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125862900788 0.0662205650399 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24846806422 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142006786577 0.0443174109184 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.