The article states that Rembrandt, a famous Dutch painter in seventeenth-century painted a lot of famous paintings but there are doubts of one of such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because its style is totally different from Rembrandt original paintings. So, the article provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that recently researchers examined this painting and confirmed that its original piece is made by Rembrandt and he refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that the woman in the painting is wearing a luxurious fur collar coat. But, the professor refutes this point by saying that x-ray analysis of the painting has shown that fur collar was not the part of original painting. He states that actually, this fur collar added painting was made 100 years after the original painting to make the painting more valuable and sophisticated.
Second, the article posits that Rembrandt was famous for light and shadow but in this painting these elements do not fit together. However, the professor says that after removing the fur collar from the painting, the original painting used just simple and light collar clothes. According to him, the light and simple collar illuminates the face of the woman and the original painting is realistic as expected from Rembrandt.
Third, the reading says that the painting was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together but Rembrandt usually painted only on wood panels. Here, the professor opposes this point by explaining that when the fur collar was added, the wood panel also enlarged with extra woods and used glue on the side and the top of the panel. We also learn that it was done to make the painting more grant and more valuable. So, according to the professor, the original painting was painted by Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inal painting was painted by Rembrandt.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07189542484 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57932380159 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467320261438 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6088836868 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.384615385 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.555816691549 0.272083759551 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.241456364762 0.0996497079465 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131193673594 0.0662205650399 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.379788393637 0.162205337803 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530382888652 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.