In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecture are discussing dowsing tools. Furthermore, The reading passage accepts the fact that the dowser works to find water, gold and so forth. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes the reading passage affirmation, thus show reasons and provide evidence to support the idea to affirm dowsing is not useful.
Is said in the reading passage that through dowsing tool water can be located, due to these rods used detects the energy of flowing underground stream vibrating. Besides, affirm that owing to their utility has gained popularity not only to find underground water, also as a tool to detect treasure, oil and dead bodies. Big companies hiring the dowsers to testimonials of satisfied customer support theirs faculties.
Contrary to the belief in the passage, the lecture gives strong reasons to put in doubt and discredit the dowsers abilities. Fist of all, the claim is against the physical law and needs to be judged, thus, nowadays we have sensitive instruments which can detect weak radio waves in space and how is possible that dowsers can detect it with a simple rod. Moreover, according to exhaustive test, the results have proven that dowsing does not work. Is is highly probable that random fluke could explain why dossing tools were successful; therefore dowsing needs to be judged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Is
...have proven that dowsing does not work. Is is highly probable that random fluke could...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'furthermore', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274193548387 0.261695866417 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.193548387097 0.158904122519 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0766129032258 0.0723426182421 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0524193548387 0.0435111971325 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0120967741935 0.0277247811725 44% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0725806451613 0.128828473217 56% => OK
Participles: 0.0564516129032 0.0370669169778 152% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56641352285 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0524193548387 0.0208969081088 251% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0927419354839 0.128158765124 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0161290322581 0.0158828679856 102% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0201612903226 0.0114777025283 176% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1361.0 1645.83664459 83% => OK
No of words: 222.0 271.125827815 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13063063063 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.414414414414 0.374372842146 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31981981982 0.287516216867 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.148648648649 0.187439937562 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103603603604 0.113142543107 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56641352285 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.539623497131 115% => OK
Word variations: 64.0589713038 53.8517498576 119% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 22.2 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4751775784 49.3711431718 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.1 132.220823453 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.878197800319 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 54.181981982 50.5018328374 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.5625 1.90840788429 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408079782112 0.549887131256 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134258701402 0.142949733639 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.059958530066 0.0787303798458 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.6066342704 0.631733273073 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127747654807 0.139662658121 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197728023085 0.266732575781 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673552470066 0.103435571967 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.385629922914 0.414875509568 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00642272570225 0.0530846634433 12% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314470864857 0.40443939384 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526762976928 0.0528353158467 100% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.