The article and the lecture both argued about did the dinosaurs are the endoderm. The article states that there is a considerable evidence that the dinosaurs are the endoderms and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor says that many scientists having the problem with the argument and they are not approved and he refutes the each of the author's opinion.
First, the reading climes that the fossils found in the polar region are an evidence for dinosaurs are the endoderms because they are the species can survive in cold temperatures. The professor opposes this point by saying the fossils found in the polar region are much warmer than today. She explained that like most reptiles dinosaurs are migrated during the winter.
Second, the article avers that the position of the legs like underneath them body and their physical movements exhibits the evidence that they can move as fast as endoderms. The professor contended this point by saying it is not necessary to move fast. he mentioned that, another explanation support that the legs under the body help to grow large size hence the clime in the passage, not a correct way to support the idea.
Finally, the article states that the Haversian bone structure seems like the dinosaurs are mammals. The professor refutes this point by saying even though it is true that they both have similar bone structure, unlike mammals they have growth rings. He illustrated that endoderms have a continued growth unlike the dinosaur, they grow periodically like fast growth in winter and then intermediate for next season and finally now growth and this is a unique character for reptais.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...approved and he refutes the each of the authors opinion. First, the reading climes tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...aying it is not necessary to move fast. he mentioned that, another explanation sup...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not a correct way to support the idea. Finally, the article states that the Hav...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, second, so, then, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03649635036 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45543148977 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510948905109 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1082663112 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221113718689 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845794190538 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466482393568 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132686387638 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266908112957 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.