The article and the professor mainly argue about the importance of seeking eco-certification to the wood companies. The article states that the international organization providing the eco-certification to the wood companies for ecological sustainability but the American wood companies now showing interest to obtain certification and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor says that for good reasons the American wood companies are showing interest to obtain certification for their product and he refutes each of the author's opinion.
The passage states that the American wood companies do not pay attention to get approve for certification to advertise their products because the United States consumers are not interested in adverts. The professor opposes this point by saying the American communities are interested in the advertisements but relay on only independent agencies because of genuine certification.
Second, the articles aver that American wood companies are not certifying their products because of the high expense. The professor contended this point by saying, of course, the consumers from united states prefer cheap products but they compare product quality. he explained that the consumer compares the certified products and prefer the low-cost product and they have not compared the certified product with noncertified wood.
Third, the passage climes that since they are not doing international trade, the wood companies not certifying their business. However, the casts a doubt on this point by saying, even though they are seel their product on the international market, they should pay attention. he illustrated that if the American wood companies need to update certification to compete with the international market.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 539, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...heir product and he refutes each of the authors opinion. The passage states that the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ducts but they compare product quality. he explained that the consumer compares th...
^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtified product with noncertified wood. Third, the passage climes that since the...
^^^
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seeled'.
Suggestion: seeled
...s point by saying, even though they are seel their product on the international mark...
^^^^
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...onal market, they should pay attention. he illustrated that if the American wood c...
^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... compete with the international market.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, third, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72623574144 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11800055373 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456273764259 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5666475391 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.909090909 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510613803918 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228457339753 0.0996497079465 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100334944603 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334224799762 0.162205337803 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193009913346 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.8541721854 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.2367328918 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.