The article and the professor mainly argued about the decline of the reading books then they do. The article climes that young people reading fewer books like the article, novels leads to decrease in their intellectual ability. However, the professor says that of course often time young people reading fewer books, but it does not mean that their knowledge fall down and she refutes the each of the author's opinions.
First, the passage states that reading fewer leads to decline the knowledge. But, the professor opposes this point by saying the article s are the gathering of the scientific journals and publications. he explained that, because of the extraction from the other sources, it would not impact on the people wisdom.
First, the passage states that current generation people attract more widely to the new technology like music, television programs and, web page reading. as a result, they are losing their cultural values. The professor opposes this point by saying there is a place for declining cultural values with the advancement of technical facilities. She mentioned that, the poems and the music directly related to culture. Furthermore, in fact, those are directly related to the culture.
Second, the reading avers that deterioration of reading not getting support for the talented writers because of the lack of the audience. The professor contended this point by saying don't blame the audience. she mentioned that it is a authors fault and she explained that, the complexity of writing results in less attracting people to read their books. yet still, people encouraging the old authors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...e scientific journals and publications. he explained that, because of the extracti...
^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...evision programs and, web page reading. as a result, they are losing their cultura...
^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rofessor contended this point by saying dont blame the audience. she mentioned that ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...oint by saying dont blame the audience. she mentioned that it is a authors fault an...
^^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the audience. she mentioned that it is a authors fault and she explained that, t...
^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yet
... attracting people to read their books. yet still, people encouraging the old autho...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, still, then, in fact, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19923371648 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54454018481 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536398467433 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0266038349 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4666666667 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265087744188 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087999740967 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698870474381 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165611486225 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549199668664 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.