The article and the professor mainly argue about the importance of seeking eco-certification to the wood companies. The article states that the international organization providing the eco-certification to the wood companies for ecological sustainability but the American wood companies not showing interest to obtain certification and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor says that for good reasons the American wood companies are showing interest to obtain certification for their product and he refutes each of the author's opinion.
First, the passage states that the American wood companies do not pay attention to get approved for certification and do not advertise their products. Since they are having a lot of adds, people of the United States consumers are not interested in adverts. The professor opposes this point by saying the American communities do not have trust in the regular advertisements. but they rely on only independent agencies because of genuine certification.
Second, the articles aver that American wood companies are not certifying their products because of the high expense to obtain certification. The professor contended this point by saying, of course, the consumers from united states prefer cheap products but they also consider the product quality. He explained that the consumer compares between the certified products and prefer the low-cost product. Unlikely, they do not compare the certified product with noncertified wood.
Third, the passage climes that since they are not doing international trade, the American wood companies not certifying their business. However, the professor casts a doubt on this point by saying, even though they are not selling their product on the international market, they should pay attention to compete to the international mark. he illustrated that if the American wood companies do not update certification, the overseas companies start to import their goods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 539, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...heir product and he refutes each of the authors opinion. First, the passage states tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 374, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ve trust in the regular advertisements. but they rely on only independent agencies ...
^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtified product with noncertified wood. Third, the passage climes that since the...
^^^
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...n to compete to the international mark. he illustrated that if the American wood c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62162162162 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1078363571 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452702702703 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0147610342 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517115406666 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202296276369 0.0996497079465 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105783992468 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341567478797 0.162205337803 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199420654483 0.0443174109184 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.