Both the article and the lecture are about dinosaurs. The article states that new evidence has proved that dinosaurs were actually endotherms, and provides three reasons of support. The professor, however, casts doubt in the claims made in the article and refutes each of the author's claims.
First, the reading states that the presence of the dinosaur fossil in the polar region can prove the fact that dinosaurs were endotherms because only the endotherms could live in such environment. However, the professor refutes this point. She says that the dinosaurs lived in the polar region many years ago when the temperature was warmer than today. Moreover, during the colder weather dinosaurs were able to migrate to warmer areas or hibernate like other reptiles.
Second, the reading claims that the position of the dinosaur's legs in the bottom of their bodies differs from the other reptiles like crocodiles and similar to other endotherms, this is mean that dinosaurs were, in fact, endotherms. This point was challenged by the professor, she states that in contrary to other endotherms, the position of dinosaur legs is, indeed, to support their huge weight and not to help them in running.
Finally, the article posits that the presence of the Haversian canal in the dinosaur's bone which helps endotherms to grow rapidly is a good evidence to support the fact that these dinosaurs were actually endotherms. This point was challenged by the professor. She states that it is true that dinosaurs have this canal but besides to that they have the growth rings, which are thickening in the bones. Extensive studies of that rings indicate that the growth of the dinosaurs ceased during the cold climate and increase again when the weather becomes warmer. while the growth of the endotherms is continuous regardless of the external temperature. Accordingly, we can not say that dinosaurs belonged to endotherms.
In conclusion, the professor succeed to refute all the the arguments that made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 559, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... again when the weather becomes warmer. while the growth of the endotherms is continu...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 559, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... again when the weather becomes warmer. while the growth of the endotherms is continu...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...on, the professor succeed to refute all the the arguments that made in the article.
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...on, the professor succeed to refute all the the arguments that made in the article.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16819571865 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58337937644 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480122324159 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.119020575 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.625 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405945826805 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126787536385 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111495325445 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203907175053 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126467366092 0.0443174109184 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.