Based on the reading material, it is stated that there are some viable theories regarding how Chaco Canyon habitants used their houses. However, the lecturer finds this idea bereft of sufficient reasoning and presents some ideas to the contrary.
Initially, the author argued that these houses were residential owing to the fact that they were very similar to apartment buildings at Taos, New Mexico. That being said, the lecturer repudiated this idea by clarifying that inside of these houses were not appropriate for housing hundreds of people. There were very few fire places which were enough for arround ten families to cook. Also, the few number of rooms inside these houses is a another evidence that they were not residential for hundreds of people.
Another point mentioned by the author was that these houses were used to store food supplies, like grain maze due to the size of the dwellings. However, the lecturer rejected this one too by stating that there is no traces of maize inside the houses. He believes that if they were used for storage, there should have existed some remains of big-maize containers, thus this theory cannot support the author's belief.
The final point advanced in the reading passage was that dwellers used the houses as ceremonial centers due to deposits of broken pots. Yet again, the lecturer casted doubt on this idea. He said that in addition to the deposits of broken pots, there are some deposits of building materials near Pueblo Alto either, which indicate that these pots maybe belong to the workers who worked there. Thus, finding deposits of pots close Pueblo Alto cannot champion the author's statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...arround ten families to cook. Also, the few number of rooms inside these houses is a anoth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... number of rooms inside these houses is a another evidence that they were not res...
^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no traces'?
Suggestion: there are no traces
...r rejected this one too by stating that there is no traces of maize inside the houses. He believes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rs, thus this theory cannot support the authors belief. The final point advanced in th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s close Pueblo Alto cannot champion the authors statement.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03636363636 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27874403568 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0575708398 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.538461538 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317682901043 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111585328088 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588940177543 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173312412918 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736040110432 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.