The argument is about the uses of 'great house' which is situated in new mexico in the american southwest.The article includes the theories about the use of huge building however, lecturer refutes all the theories mentioned in the passage.
Firstly, it is mentioned that chaco houses were used by people for residential purpose and around hundred of people lived there. Lecturer cast doubt on this theory by suggesting that if these many number of people lived there, then there must be more number of fire places should be there,but actually there were only few fire place and so, the people are also less in number.Hence, the building not used for residential purpose.
Secondly, lecturer states that excavation was done at the building and there were no evidences that big containers are present at the building.However, in article it is mentioned that big containers were used for storing of grain maize for long duration and the building served the purpose.
Lastly, lecturer says that evidences at the pueblo alto consist of a mound formed by a pile of old material having a trash thrown by construction workers.Large building material like sand, stone, and construction tools were present at the site along with the broken pots.However,theory suggested that broken pots were the evidence of building used for ceremonial purpose.
In conclusion, lecturer refutes all the claim made in the passage by providing persuasive argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...in new mexico in the american southwest.The article includes the theories about the...
^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
...this theory by suggesting that if these many number of people lived there, then there must ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...re number of fire places should be there,but actually there were only few fire place...
^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
... fire place and so, the people are also less in number.Hence, the building not used for reside...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
... so, the people are also less in number.Hence, the building not used for residential ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... containers are present at the building.However, in article it is mentioned that big c...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are present at the building.However, in article it is mentioned that big contain...
^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Large
... a trash thrown by construction workers.Large building material like sand, stone, and...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... at the site along with the broken pots.However,theory suggested that broken pots were ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , theory
... site along with the broken pots.However,theory suggested that broken pots were the evi...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268774703557 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.158102766798 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0948616600791 0.0723426182421 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0592885375494 0.0435111971325 136% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00790513833992 0.0277247811725 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.173913043478 0.128828473217 135% => OK
Participles: 0.0632411067194 0.0370669169778 171% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89503436755 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0 0.0208969081088 0% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.098814229249 0.128158765124 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00790513833992 0.0158828679856 50% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00790513833992 0.0114777025283 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1443.0 1645.83664459 88% => OK
No of words: 232.0 271.125827815 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21982758621 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383620689655 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284482758621 0.287516216867 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.23275862069 0.187439937562 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112068965517 0.113142543107 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89503436755 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556034482759 0.539623497131 103% => OK
Word variations: 53.2233329041 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 38.6666666667 21.7502111507 178% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.404817768 49.3711431718 195% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 240.5 132.220823453 182% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 38.6666666667 21.7502111507 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 0.878197800319 266% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 3.39072847682 295% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 67.1149425287 50.5018328374 133% => OK
Elegance: 2.24561403509 1.90840788429 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.602067453775 0.549887131256 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.212966319542 0.142949733639 149% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.103834361086 0.0787303798458 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.923714018807 0.631733273073 146% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133813925049 0.139662658121 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.34598946487 0.266732575781 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089448268211 0.103435571967 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.25285865492 0.414875509568 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.103096051667 0.0530846634433 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.374067542416 0.40443939384 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854001046618 0.0528353158467 162% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.