In the reading passage was made several points as a possible explanation of predestination of the Chaco “great houses”. However, in the lecture the professor rebuts all the teories and suggests an explaination why he thinks this way.
According to the reading passage, the “great housе” could be enormous residentials similar to the “apartment building” at Taos. Nevertheless, the Professor asserts that It doesn’t seem right because the quantity of fire places wasn’t enough for warming up hundreds of famalies.
The second assumption is that the Chaco houses probably could serve as a storage for the food supplies. However, the professor casts doubt on this theory either. He considers that no traces of crops was found in the building or near them. Besides, containers and food packages was also absent inside the “great houses”.
Finally, A third theory proposes that house was used as a ceremonial centers, but this conclusion scarcely could be consider as a truth. The professor argues that in the comparison with the Pueblo Alto houses, the Chaco places doesn’t contain any specific material such as sand and stones. Moreover, the pots, found near to the building, could be just a useless trash.
To wrap up, the professor considerations contradicts with the all three teories made in the reading passage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4882629108 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13966236671 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2046407974 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4166666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209082908411 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858729062701 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593878716388 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119662298515 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697195658696 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.