The article describes three competing theories to explain the purpose of Choco structure. However, the professor says that none of the theories presented in the article is believable and refutes each of the author's reasons by questioning the authenticity of each theory.
First, reading claims that primary purpose of Choco structures was residential since it has enough room to support hundreds of people. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that if there were hundreds of individuals living in this house, then there should have been large number of fire cooking spots. He states that only few fire cooking places have been discovered and in addition to this, in one of the biggest houses, there are enough rooms to support more than hundred families but has only ten fire cooking places. Hence, primary purpose of this structure could not be residential.
Second, the article posits that food supplies like grain maize were preserved in Choco structures. However, the professor says that this idea is unsupported. According to professor if maize were stored in these houses then why aren't there any containers that used to store maize or why there is no maize spilled over ground. Thus absence of containers question the validity of second theory.
Third, the article says that Choco structures were used as ceremony centers. The professor opposes this point by explaining that evidences are not enough to prove that these houses were used for ceremonies. He states that, even though, pile of old materials discovered in Choco structures, excavations of the mound contain materials that are not used in ceremonies. For example, materials like sand and other construction tools. In additon to this, pots found in this place could be used by construction employees. Thus, presence of old materials and pots are not enough to conclude the third hypothesis.
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.70
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs wer71
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.77
- Do you agree or disagree technology has made children life less creative than in the past. support your answer with reasons and examples.90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...e are enough rooms to support more than hundred families but has only ten fire cooking ...
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...ze were stored in these houses then why arent there any containers that used to store...
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
... there is no maize spilled over ground. Thus absence of containers question the vali...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, third, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21782178218 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61190212265 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511551155116 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3556924275 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8125 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252295077879 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806893188492 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437738084318 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137821009602 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455546221861 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.