The reading and the lecture discuss whether the American customers would be interested in buying the ecocertified woods or not. The author of the reading provides three reasons to prove that Americans unlikely to buy these products, however, the lecturer refutes all these claims in the reading.
First, the article says that the US citizens are more affected by the advertisements and will not pay attention to those new products. The speaker, on the other hand, rebuts this assumption by stating the Americans can distinguish between the truthful and dishonest ads. Besides, they have a lot of confidence in the private organizations that evaluate to the companies and their products.
Second, the text argues that the price of the certified products will be much higher than the other woods. Conversely, the professor rejects this notion. He explains that would be true only if the difference in price is noticeable, but if it is just a small ratio, the people would prefer the certified woods. Moreover, he elaborates that the Americans know the value of preserving the environment and will pay for these woods if the limit of difference does not exceed 5% .
Third, the passage contends that some American companies does not pay attention to the global market because their customers are mainly in the united states. The speaker, in contrast, refutes this supposition and he asserts that the American companies keep abreast with the development in the international markets because they realize that some foreign companies could invade the American market if they did not keep themselves updated with the latest trends in the wood trade. Therefore, it is better to adapt these new certification policy to maintain their own clients.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idence in the private organizations that evaluate to the companies and their prod...
^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e limit of difference does not exceed 5% . Third, the passage contends that som...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1914893617 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72675692651 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556737588652 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4744392176 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41775587809 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126910930773 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716329271623 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21732085152 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757180408549 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.