The reading talks about the danger associated with the glass windows for the birds. The author gives three possible solutions to this problem. The lecturer casts doubt on all the claims made by the author.
First of all, the author talks about the one-way glass that is transparent in one direction which unable the birds to see throw the glass, and as a result avert the crash. The lecturer refutes this solutions. He explains that the one-way glass is like a mirror and it will reflects the picture of the sky or a tree. The problem that the birds will understand the picture as a reality and they will just fly throw the windows.
Secondly, the author suggests that the coloured windows provide the birds to avoid them, in the same time people will still be able to see throw the windows. The lecturer ,in the other hand, puts on forth the idea that the birds will see the designs as a hole and they will not be able to avoid coloured windows, and even if we try to make the lines extremely small the rooms inside will be too dark and this will not solve the problem.
Third, the author states that birds use magnetic held to help them navigate. To help the flying creatures to get away from the buildings it is sufficient to install magnetic field surrounding it. The professors opposes this idea. He posits that some researches proved that birds use their magnetic held only in the long distance, for example to migrate from cold country to another. However, for short distances they do not use this technique, they rely on their eyes and brightness of the day light. As a conclusion this solution will not be effective.
To assume, the lecturer effectively casts doubts on all the claims and solutions proposed in the text.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ree possible solutions to this problem. The lecturer casts doubt on all the claims ...
^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t avert the crash. The lecturer refutes this solutions. He explains that the one-way...
^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reflect'
Suggestion: reflect
...-way glass is like a mirror and it will reflects the picture of the sky or a tree. The p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e to see throw the windows. The lecturer ,in the other hand, puts on forth the ide...
^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'oppose'.
Suggestion: oppose
...ic field surrounding it. The professors opposes this idea. He posits that some research...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 502, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r eyes and brightness of the day light. As a conclusion this solution will not be ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64401294498 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28189535871 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511326860841 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0092440796 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6875 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115919240131 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407410120394 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030239179836 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0584868618687 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317185702326 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.