The reading and the lecture talk about the relation between the productivity and rewards . The lecture provides that people are more productive when they are rewarded , however the professore explain that this methode may decrease the prodectivity and refutes the authors idea by giving exemples .
First, the reading claims that many companies follow this approach to encourage employees to work harder with different method such as promotion, luxury vacation, and as a result the gain increase . according to the professor this strategy of rewarding workers is not appreciated by the workers because they feel like they are controlled or manipulated and they even consider it as a punishment and this result less productivity, in addition he say that people deserve more respect for their extra hard work .
Second the reading states that the best way to achieve great results is when the reward system is correctly structured, in the other side the professor oppose this opinion by saying that the more people are related to the rewards the more their expectation for this gift is higher and this will lead them to disappointment, he explain that the workers will never tell their work problems to the supervisor because their afraid they lose the reward and as a result the qualities of the work will decrease .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ion between the productivity and rewards . The lecture provides that people are mo...
^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e more productive when they are rewarded , however the professore explain that thi...
^^
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...crease the prodectivity and refutes the authors idea by giving exemples . First, the...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...utes the authors idea by giving exemples . First, the reading claims that many ...
^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ation, and as a result the gain increase . according to the professor this strateg...
^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...on, and as a result the gain increase . according to the professor this strategy of rewar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e more respect for their extra hard work . Second the reading states that the b...
^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...is will lead them to disappointment, he explain that the workers will never tell their ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the qualities of the work will decrease .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12093023256 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65799265623 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 21.2450331126 202% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 140.120519554 49.2860985944 284% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 220.2 110.228320801 200% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.0 21.698381199 198% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06452816374 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226687482468 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160586273302 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13297252339 0.0662205650399 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181712520942 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131918703751 0.0443174109184 298% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.2 13.3589403974 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 53.8541721854 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 11.0289183223 182% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.498013245 183% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.