The author describes that the United States wood companies do not care about obtaining ecological certification for their products and provides three reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the lecturer states that the American wood companies will practice for receiving eco-certification and refutes each of the author's reasons with rational grounds.
First of all, the writer states that American consumers would not pay attention to the eco-certification label, since they are bombarded with so many advertisements. Nevertheless, the professor points out that this claim is true just when companies advertise their own products, but when they advertise other products people could trust them.
Second, according to the reading, American consumer prefer to buy cheaper uncertified products instead of buying more expensive ones with eco-certification. However, the lecturer brings up the idea that all of the people care about prices of the products, but it is not the only factor to make a decision. People prefer to buy cheaper products when their prices are comparatively higher or lower, so if differences among the costs of the products are lower than five dollars, they would rather buy certified products than uncertified ones, which protect and preserve the environment.
Third, the author expresses that American wood companies will pursue the eco-certification only if they marketed their products to foreign countries. However, the speaker posits that American companies pay attention to what's going in the international business. As a matter of fact, if they do not value to the eco-certified products, abroad companies will dominate the United States market, hence native companies will lose their chance.
Therefore, the points mentioned in the reading do not make any sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r, the lecturer brings up the idea that all of the people care about prices of the product...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...hat American companies pay attention to whats going in the international business. As...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, as a matter of fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52707581227 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01573936 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537906137184 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5449438175 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.181818182 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06452816374 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494042222492 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185865432131 0.0996497079465 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934074354024 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247499163186 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128853820597 0.0443174109184 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.