The reading and the lecture are both about the certification to wood companies that help to conserve and recycle materials. The author of the reading gives three reasons to support his idea that the companies around the world have adopted this program except the wood companies of the U.S A. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article that none of those arguments are convincing.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that Americans do not trust in advertising and they also do not pay attention to the eco- certification label. This point is challenged by the lecture. He says that Americans watch the advertising selectively. They really concern about the eco-certification and they are confident in this advertising and have a good reaction on it.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that the cost of the eco-certified wood is more expensive than the price of uncertified wood. Meanwhile American concern about price. The lecture rebuts this reason that it is true that Americans care about the cost of materials, but only if the cost of one competition is too high or too low compared to other companies. If the cost about 5 percent they will choose this materials in order to protect the environment.
Finally, the author of the reading states the reading expresses that American companies do not have to worry about eco-certification because most of the wood companies are in the united states , so they do not export so much wood internationally. The professor counters this idea by saying that even though the wood industry do not need to compete with international companies. This foreing companies could see an important target in the United States for the people who cares about the eco-certification and become competitors with the national companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...gram except the wood companies of the U.S A. The lecture casts doubt on the claim...
^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ive than the price of uncertified wood. Meanwhile American concern about price. The lectu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or too low compared to other companies. If the cost about 5 percent they will choo...
^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e cost about 5 percent they will choose this materials in order to protect the envir...
^^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inally, the author of the reading states the reading expresses that American comp...
^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... wood companies are in the united states , so they do not export so much wood inte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03666666667 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95698980382 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8966571236 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.928571429 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40773401292 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141762499951 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775814911173 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251740740372 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506111737954 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.