The reading questions the memoir of Chevalier which some critics doubt the accuracy of it. On the other hand, the lecture explains that the memoir is pretty accurate and reliable.
To begin with, the reading asserts that Chevalier was not rich because he had to borrow money from a Swiss merchant. However, the lecturer refutes this argument. She said that Chevalier need fresh money while he waited to sell his properties.
Next, the passage doubts the memoir accuracy about the conversations between Chevalier and Voltaire. The conversations was occured many years earlier before the memoir. It is impossible to remember the exact word. Nevertheless, the professor disputes this argument. She argues that Chevalier wrote down directly after the conversations. He kept that notes and consulted it with Voltaire until he wrote the memoir.
Last, the reading mentions that Chevalier bribed the jailers while the lecture refutes it. She expains that there are more prisoner who has more powers despite they couldnot escape. Also, there are government document tells that the Chevalier ceiling had to be repaired.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...evalier and Voltaire. The conversations was occured many years earlier before the m...
^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'prisoners'?
Suggestion: prisoners
...tes it. She expains that there are more prisoner who has more powers despite they couldn...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'documents'?
Suggestion: documents
...dnot escape. Also, there are government document tells that the Chevalier ceiling had to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, nevertheless, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 176.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5768157363 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.3429775277 49.2860985944 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.4285714286 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5714285714 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456916961873 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1378795044 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091854800762 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256500997119 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602803670712 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.92 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.