The reading passage and the lecture are both about cons and pros of hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine. The author of the reading believes that hydrogen will became the best constitution for the oil fuel.
The lecturer considers that the statments made in the reading passage are to optimistic about the future of the hydrogen based engines, and she reinforces her opinion by making several examples.
First of all, hydrogen is presented in all compaunds, but it’s artificial as a pure element. The lecturee agree on that hydrogen is the well presented resourse, but she denotes that it’s hard to produce and store hydrogen in the liquid form, because of the low temperature.
The subsequent lecturer argument is related to statment made in the passage, that using hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine will cause the decline of pollution. She disputes this by claiming that the hydrogen manufacturing process will increase pollution. She states that process of purification and syntesis of hydrogen from the coal and oil will pollute the atmosphere more than the novel hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines.
Finally, it is implied that the hydrogen fuel will by cheaper that the oil fuel. However, the lecturer claims that the engines consisted from expensive platinum material will cost much more money than the usual oil-based engines. She states that the manufacturing procedure of hydrogen is going to be pricy as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...the reading believes that hydrogen will became the best constitution for the oil fuel....
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he best constitution for the oil fuel. The lecturer considers that the statments m...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33777777778 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83740796337 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528888888889 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7061633606 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.181818182 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329923313503 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147942842704 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963879661219 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188979379681 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115892697906 0.0443174109184 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.