The article states that people are reading far less literature, novels and so on, and this will affect their culture and future of the literature and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that, although people are spending less time to read the literature it won't affect their culture and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that the decline in book reading is more sharp for literature and it worsens when we understand that nothing else has the intellectual stimulations that literature does. On the other hand, the professor refutes this point by stating that many other topics and subjects can stimulate intellectually more than literature such as science.
Second, the passage claims that people are reading superficial poorly written instead of pieces of literature and also they waste their time watching TV, listening to music, etc. By the way, the lecture contends this by stating that, people read less bok in general because the culture has changed and people are willing to be stimulated by something more directly such as good music or an interesting movie and they can influence their culture much better than a novel or literature.
Finally, the reading avers that reading less literature is taking place during a period when good literature is being written. The lecture opposes this point by declaring that we can't blame the readers because of this problem, it is the author's faults since their writtings and novels are to difficult to read and need a specialist that's why people don't tend to read them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...opposes this point by declaring that we cant blame the readers because of this probl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ts since their writtings and novels are to difficult to read and need a specialist...
^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...difficult to read and need a specialist thats why people dont tend to read them.
^^^^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... and need a specialist thats why people dont tend to read them.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, in general, such as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10769230769 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50615809604 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6212165684 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.0 110.228320801 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 21.698381199 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.125 7.06452816374 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.521448677147 0.272083759551 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264151046807 0.0996497079465 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106564079343 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338847449916 0.162205337803 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022143324364 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.