The reading passage and the lecture are both about an issue connected with the decline of reading among the young people. The author of the snippet believies that people read less intellectual literature. On the other hand, the lecturer considers that the statements made in the passage are slitely wrong, and she reinfoces her opinion by providing several examples.
First of all, there is identified in the reading fragment that by reading less literature publi miss a lot of benefits of it. However, The lecturer asserts that there are planty of other sourses with the good quality content. Consequently, due to that, people still can get a lot of captivating and intellectual information by reading scientific articles, history books, political newspapers which aren’t a literature at all, but they also can stimulate the humankind’s minds.
The subsequent speaker argument is related to the statement made in the except, that people choose to read intellectually undemanding books instead of the classic ones. She disputes this by claiming that sometimes it is not right to blame readers, when it is authors fault. She supposes that today a lot of authors making such type of books which is hard to understand, and people prefer to read more simple literature instead.
Finally, there is denoted in the reading passage that people tend to watch more TV, listent o music instead of reading. The speaker concurs that people become to read less, but she claims that movies and music nowadays are also a representation of culture and have their own intellectual meaning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f it. However, The lecturer asserts that there are planty of other sourses with t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, so, still, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1673151751 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82544934738 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56420233463 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0014946131 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367295269576 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144942242683 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892749671434 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218878979583 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163581048761 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.