The reading passage and the lecture are both about different cons and pros of genetically modified trees. The author of the snippet believes that there are a lot of benefits from the genetic modification. However, the lecturer considers that the statements made in the reading fragment are wrong, and she reinforces her opinion by providing three contrary examples.
First of all, there is indicated in the reading fragment that genetically modified trees tend to survive in the severe conditions in contrary to the usual trees. However, the speaker asserts that modified trees are usually resistent to the one type of conditions, when wild trees are more adaptive. Consequently, in the case of climate changes all genetically modified trees will possibly die because of the changing conditions.
The subsequent lecturer argument is related to the statement made in the excerpt that increasing velocity of modified tree growth and greater yields of food are the benefits for the farmers. The lecturer disputes this statement by claiming that usage of the midified crops has hidden costs. In other words, farmers aren’t able to plant the seeds of the modified trees and, more importantly, they ought ot make payment to the companies, which invented this type of the genetically modified plants.
Finally, there is denoted in the reading passage that genetically modified trees prevent the overuse of wild trees. The lecturer states that all genetically made plants are able to damage the wild plants which grow nearby. Moreover, this modified plants grow really agressively and demand a lot of space to grow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d trees are more adaptive. Consequently, in the case of climate changes all genet...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, really, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28682170543 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67713601974 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4858306564 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419815279885 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166242298468 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887897071127 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263925290763 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884909403687 0.0443174109184 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.