n the reading passage, the professor made several points about effectiveness of a four-day workweek. The professor casts doubt on the possible benefits to a company and to an employee from the four-day workweek and he makes several examples to support his idea.
According to the professor shortage of the workweek won’t affect on company’s benefits. In the reading passage, It is said that four-day workweek will lead to the hiring of more qualified staff and increase company’s profit. The Professor doesn’t agree with this statement and claims that increasing number of employees will force company to put more money into the health insurance and training for the new members of a company. Besides, the company will have to organize more office space for the new employees and all these spendings will probably won’t cut into profit.
Another statement of the reading passage that employees will benefit from having more free time. Professor contradicts this idea and asserts that if employees have more free time they won’t be able to build their career properly. He believes that bosses tend to promote employees who work on a five-day workweek and professor also thinks that four-day workweek employees are under bigger risk to lose their jobs than others.
In conclusion, the points made in lecture contrast with the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
n the reading passage, the professor made...
^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...sor shortage of the workweek won't affect on company's benefits. In the reading...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3133640553 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72765128778 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552995391705 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9767378939 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.3 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328804731616 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136916756579 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706437895361 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178268446775 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113344704655 0.0443174109184 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.