The reading passage and the lecture are both about the accuracy of Chevalier de Seingalt memoir, which is a valuable historical source. There accuracy ot the memoir is a controvercial question and was discussed by lots of people. In the reading passge it is claims that Chevalier exsegerated many facts of his life to make it more colorfut. On the other hand, the lecturer consider that facts discribed in memoir is thue.
Fist of all, there was an evidence, that Chevalier was a wealthy man. However, during his presence in Switherland he had to borrow money from the Swiss merchent and it seems controversial. The woman asserts that most of the money of Chevalier was in form of property and if he needed to use them he had to wait a couple of days to convert the property to money.
Secondly, the woman states that after every the conversation with Voltaire, Chevalier always was making small notes to fix the main ideas they have discussed. It contradicts with the critics opinion. They believed that Chevalier didn’t properly expressed the phrases and meaning of the conversation, because he wrote about this conversations a few year after his meetings with Voltaire.
To wrup up, the woman considaration about accuracy of Chevalier’s memoir contradicts with information in the reading passage and she isn’t not hezitate about its accuracy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
...e conversation with Voltaire, Chevalier always was making small notes to fix the main idea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'critics'' or 'critic's'?
Suggestion: critics'; critic's
...have discussed. It contradicts with the critics opinion. They believed that Chevalier d...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...he conversation, because he wrote about this conversations a few year after his meet...
^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun year seems to be countable; consider using: 'few years'.
Suggestion: few years
...use he wrote about this conversations a few year after his meetings with Voltaire. To w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06222222222 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92856852067 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.196617052 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.545454545 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449831313165 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15315253788 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506148627896 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234101298563 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630749125698 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.