The reading passage and the lecture are both about problems in uncovering and studying old artefacts in the United Kindom area. The author of the snippet describes several major issues archaeologists face during their work. On the other hand, the lecturer provides the information about new government law, which is supposed to improve the situation.
First of all, there is identified in the reading fragment that builders often destroy important archaeological evidence while they are making a foundation of a building. However, the lecturer assets that nowadays contractors, if they find something important, should invite archaeologist to examine the ground before continuing the work. Likewise, all the archaeological evidence should be under government supervision.
The subsequent lecturer argument is related to the statement made in the excerpt, that archaeologists lack a financial support, which is provided only on the most general projects. The lecturer claims that, conserning the new law, a contractor should provide foundings for the different archaeological investigation in the area next to his buildings. She supposes that it will influence positively on investigations as a whole and will give a new source of financial support to archaeologists.
To conclude, the professor states that new government law will bring a lot of benefit to archaeological society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, so, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68269230769 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27633560552 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.507845207 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204248598905 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785278457845 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305045819545 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116841729326 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191833321979 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.