The reading passage states that reading less literature has a harmful effect for the reading of public, culture and the future of literature. However, the lecturer cast doubt on each argument of the author.
First and foremost, the reading suggests because people read less literature they lost the benefits of it. Reading literature encourages the imagination of people and sustain them to expand their understanding of language. On the other hand, the professor rejected this by saying the literature is not only one which encourages the creativity of people. According to her, there are many other types of books that can support the creativity such as science fictions, political and histories.
Secondly, the article indicates people spend most of their time in entertainment things such as watch a TV, listening to music and surfing on the internet instead of reading literature which diminish the culture. In contrast, the lecturer argues that the ways of learning culture has changed, now people have more options to improve themselves and get information about the culture. She also said that there are many movies and music which dedicated to the culture.
Finally, the passage claims that the number of writers declining because of the lack of audiences even though they are talented or not. Nonetheless, the professor refuses that by explaining it is not only depend on the lack of audience, but the modern literature is hard to understand for normal people that is the responsibility of the author.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20816326531 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7395752961 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2632993508 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424204874814 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150468490978 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141078047353 0.0662205650399 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2452735202 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101644106118 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.