To comense, the contet is all about the Jane Austin, the well known writer of 17th century. There were several novels which made her stardom during her lifetime and some are even adapted to Hollywood movies. But the real picture of Jane Austen had not been actually known to anybody till the time, when the Austen's family recently put a sell on one of her potraint, as they asserted it. Due to limited knowledge of how she looks like, and many more, there have been various allegation raised that painting doesn't resembles her. Speaker has addressed some serious cogent remarks which if take into consideration possibly can help us to evaluate the whole mystery. Let discuss some of them below.
Firstly, there was an painting which was put on sale by Austen's family cerntainly resembles to painting made by cassandra and many people would rathere believe on this fact. But concern which causes diliema, is that when this painting was put on sale was long after death of Jane. Precisely it was around 70 years later this painting was put on sale, so if introspect, family probably had not seen Jane at all in her teenage, as painting resembles for her teenage look.
Secondly, facial look in the painting mainly resembled with painting made by Cassandra. But speaker has cogent remark that it would rather be some of extended relative of Jane. As Jane would not rather look the one in painting. The canvas which was used for painting was apparently known not be sold at that time in London, when Jane was teenager and concreately make impression of context.
Third,as asserted in paraphrase Humphrey a well know society painter of that era, had made the painting of Jane. But there are several reason to contradicts this impression as canvas used in the painting was not been made availble in London in that decade.
To finish, there are plenty convincing data provided in the context, but speaker has successfully contradicted them and would convince with statements advocated by speaker.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 507, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...various allegation raised that painting doesnt resembles her. Speaker has addressed so...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 585, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...essed some serious cogent remarks which if take into consideration possibly can he...
^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...me of them below. Firstly, there was an painting which was put on sale by Auste...
^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r be some of extended relative of Jane. As Jane would not rather look the one in p...
^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...ely make impression of context. Third,as asserted in paraphrase Humphrey a well ...
^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...ade the painting of Jane. But there are several reason to contradicts this impression as canva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'was not' or 'has not been'?
Suggestion: was not; has not been
...pression as canvas used in the painting was not been made availble in London in that decade....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90560471976 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43935502128 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533923303835 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9261546874 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9375 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336580786591 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108067200388 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850780206331 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167984703627 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989343514876 0.0443174109184 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.