"Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with the station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, several local businesses that used to run advertisements during our late-night news program have just cancelled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand the coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs."
As rightly discussed in the argument, Viewers are slowly ignoring the Late-night news program due to very certain things that news have switched major time allocated to local news and national news. This would have plenty of reason to have debate why decision of changing allocated time have backfired new channel.
Late-night new program would have viewers which reside in place which might be very much remote from the urban areas possibly in outskirts of city. So local interest in lacking of national news and whats going around the country, because they might unlinked to people of Urban areas.
If the place told in the narration, where late-night program is broadcasted is residing near places where natural calamities are sporadic and cannot be predicted certainly, So thus weather forecast channel would be surely the priority and it will undeniable fact resulting in sparing viewers who are interested iin national trivial matters. For them local surviaval is must, so at any cost they won't accept the change and it has rightly affected the analytics mentioned in the narration. It can be possibly people some time don't give any much importance to national news as it my the case take cite of Vatican city, even it is small country situated in mid of Italy they don't concern much about what is happening in Italian parliament So what is common to such people is weather forecast as they both are sharing the same part of earth.
It may be possibly good reason to switch for late-news program to devoting time to make people aware of current affairs or just inception of steps towards changing the actual value of the program. But it some it backfired the decision as the people are not tending show there interest as matter of fact they have revoked the steps taken and moved back to earlier version of new program. It would be obviate as the new aired program is lacking viewers would be certainly make mind of invester or people who publish their advertisement to take money back.
As stated that most appropriate decision take in the context is that they will move back to older policy, I personally that will be very much prudent act. othersise they can go in market and take survey for why the things are not favouring them. It would
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...nterest in lacking of national news and whats going around the country, because they ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 526, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...on. It can be possibly people some time dont give any much importance to national ne...
^^^^
Line 4, column 673, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...l country situated in mid of Italy they dont concern much about what is happening in...
^^^^
Line 8, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Othersise
...lly that will be very much prudent act. othersise they can go in market and take survey f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... things are not favouring them. It would
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237745098039 0.25644967241 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.18137254902 0.15541462614 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112745098039 0.0836205057962 135% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0661764705882 0.0520304965353 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0539215686275 0.0272364105082 198% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.115196078431 0.125424944231 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0637254901961 0.0416121511921 153% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.38727557123 2.79052419416 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0294117647059 0.026700313972 110% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0661764705882 0.113004496875 59% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0392156862745 0.0255425247493 154% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0269607843137 0.0127820249294 211% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2259.0 2731.13054187 83% => OK
No of words: 388.0 446.07635468 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82216494845 6.12365571057 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.57801047555 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340206185567 0.378187486979 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.262886597938 0.287650121315 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.164948453608 0.208842608468 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0850515463918 0.135150697306 63% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38727557123 2.79052419416 86% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 207.018472906 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510309278351 0.469332199767 109% => OK
Word variations: 55.7467220924 52.1807786196 107% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.039408867 65% => OK
Sentence length: 29.8461538462 23.2022227129 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.8481745692 57.7814097925 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.769230769 141.986410481 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8461538462 23.2022227129 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.384615384615 0.724660767414 53% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 56.13481364 51.9672348444 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.38211382114 1.8405768891 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345509834497 0.441005458295 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152242230063 0.135418324435 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0634115568017 0.0829849096947 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.636499151376 0.58762219726 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165630427209 0.147661913831 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155207020169 0.193483328276 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102403386522 0.0970749176394 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.309299091967 0.42659136922 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0655464718061 0.0774707102158 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232299655196 0.312017818177 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846282433682 0.0698173142475 121% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.