A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
Ocenia university have given fond cite about the things which have caused the nuance in the relation between professors and students. As rightly said by many intellectuals that relation between student and teacher is most diffident relation around the world. This relation is so much bonded on thin line that if somethings goes in vain, all things will be spoiled and eventually it will cost in denigration of education system. So all possible steps should be taken to avoid the any collapse of this relationship.
As observed by analytics of university, it can be observed that lot of professors were moving out of the university and for which some steps were taken which eventually helped them to stop the outflow of professor. Social involvement of students with teachers is very much necessary in today's world. Organizing this relation with adding some perks always preserve the attachment. As professor were given more time to interact with student and understand them better, which add bonding between this two entities.
Sometime student doesn't enough idea or knowledge in lecture time which predefined by educational institutions, so in such scenario students need seek someone to understand the topic or subject. Sometime this learning is passed on by their peers, but sometime they explicitly need teacher or professor who can make them understand the fundamentals. And such things will need extra efforts excluding your college lecture, so if professor are allowed to mentor such opportunities, it would be mutual benefit for both student and professor.
By Introducing such extra efforts, the sociability between student and lecture increases enormously. Some students can't afford extra classes or private tutors to clarify the dubious topics. So such are deprived of getting full fledged knowledge, which other student who have money can afford. As university provide such a steps in which student are given extra time with professor to clarify the obscure concepts, it adds as touch of kindness for students. Eventually social gap between student and professor curtails by such initiative.
Ideal Professors are one, who gives student first priority and without any selfish thoughts they transfer the knowledge to students.
Professors have to much affections with students which can be affected by many things. So if professor gets more time to interact with students they will surely retain to universities and by taking such steps in future will add value in both perspective, student and professor. And will provide stiff growth education across the cou
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...n this two entities. Sometime student doesnt enough idea or knowledge in lecture tim...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ure increases enormously. Some students cant afford extra classes or private tutors ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 17, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...knowledge to students. Professors have to much affections with students which can...
^^
Line 6, column 20, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...wledge to students. Professors have to much affections with students which can be a...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261958997722 0.25644967241 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.173120728929 0.15541462614 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100227790433 0.0836205057962 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0387243735763 0.0520304965353 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0273348519362 0.0272364105082 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132118451025 0.125424944231 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0546697038724 0.0416121511921 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73157448791 2.79052419416 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0250569476082 0.026700313972 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0683371298405 0.113004496875 60% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0273348519362 0.0255425247493 107% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0273348519362 0.0127820249294 214% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2576.0 2731.13054187 94% => OK
No of words: 408.0 446.07635468 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3137254902 6.12365571057 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.57801047555 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.411764705882 0.378187486979 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.333333333333 0.287650121315 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.223039215686 0.208842608468 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142156862745 0.135150697306 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73157448791 2.79052419416 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 207.018472906 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485294117647 0.469332199767 103% => OK
Word variations: 52.9284562706 52.1807786196 101% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.4 23.2022227129 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4766698429 57.7814097925 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.8 141.986410481 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 23.2022227129 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.25 0.724660767414 34% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 53.7333333333 51.9672348444 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.87619047619 1.8405768891 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0915920081693 0.441005458295 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123686743251 0.135418324435 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0589319456272 0.0829849096947 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52600304575 0.58762219726 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161845947099 0.147661913831 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360097737403 0.193483328276 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302614759642 0.0970749176394 31% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.2524628812 0.42659136922 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0805850115985 0.0774707102158 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0588887915101 0.312017818177 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230139621012 0.0698173142475 33% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.33743842365 132% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 6.46551724138 139% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.