A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
This argument states the retention of professors by, apparently, offering them free tuition for their respective children in the respective universities of their work. The choice of retention of any particular faculty depends on many factors, like safety, security, economical benefits, work challenges, and most importantly incentives.
Here, the faculty committee suggests that Seatown University offer a thing to their respective professors, that comes as a part of economic benefits. I absolutely do not support this argument, if that particular child of a professor is, statistically, not worthy to receive a chance to pursue education from that particular university.
It is banal in every organization that every labor must be paid some economic benefits, such as health insurance, etc, as an appreciation for their arduous effort. But, every organization examines the credibility to avail that offers, here adeptness. In this argument, if that particular child of any lecturer is, statistically, skillful enough to have a seat in the university that offer can be availed under the economic benefit of labor.
In contrast, for the benefit of retention, if the administration condones the child's ineptness and agrees to his/ her seat in the university. Then, any consequences related to his/ her interests, limits, or potential will be annihilated by their administration themselves. I am not stating that the above will definitely be the case, but the probability of the above possibility is quite threatening. And on the other hand, professors who are staying in the same university so that this offer can be availed are undeniably foolish, and apparently receding themselves from an improvement. So, some terms and conditions with this argument are definitely necessary.
In sum, I concede with the argument of the faculty committee if and only if the universities credibility is mathematically matched with the child's adeptness. And, though some economical benefits are rights of strenuous labor, the evidence stated here may not be sufficient to conclude. So, more data should be collected and evaluated on the basis of subjective opinions. We as a society should definitely support the labor in any field in order to expect a good product quality, here knowledge of the students who ought to be graduated for the particular university.
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 14 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 367 350
No. of Characters: 1927 1500
No. of Different Words: 183 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.377 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.251 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.096 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 97 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 71 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.938 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.562 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.812 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.313 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.521 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...on many factors, like safety, security, economical benefits, work challenges, and most imp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...he faculty committee if and only if the universities credibility is mathematically matched w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 176, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... the childs adeptness. And, though some economical benefits are rights of strenuous labor,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, may, so, then, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 367.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42506811989 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18590955222 2.78398813304 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523160762943 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 705.55239521 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.36810137 57.8364921388 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.4375 119.503703932 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 5.70786347227 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164276917444 0.218282227539 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545195716482 0.0743258471296 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721514508992 0.0701772020484 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10500059945 0.128457276422 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664484810928 0.0628817314937 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.3799401198 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.3550499002 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.5979740519 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 98.500998004 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 12.3882235529 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.